I have had a lot of leaders in the past, but how many were actually transformative in how they led? I wondered if it was necessary for the leader to intentionally be transformative. I've had leaders that inspired through positive example. I've also had leaders that served as negative examples. Northouse (2018) described these types of leaders as psuedotranformational leaders. The positive examples made me want to work harder for several reasons; to impress them and gain their respect, to exceed their expectations, and be a better mechanic and supervisor. The negative examples influenced me through fear and anxiety; I strove to avoid punishment and struggled to remember the intricate and inane details of daily activities that didn't require that level of micromanagement.
Reflecting on what I think made the leaders transformative, I also consider the role I played in their ability to be transformative. In circumstances where I was happy in my job and interested in learning more skills I was more receptive to being led in such a transformative way. I also responded to transactional leadership, especially early in my career. One of the most valuable things a military leader can give their people is time off. Being cut loose early on a Friday was an amazing feeling. Even my negative examples could turn that exercise into something I would dread. Was I sent home because I did something wrong? Or was it because I did something well? The goal posts were always moving. So, I never knew where I stood.
Ultimately, my experiences have made me the leader that I am today. I try to set a positive example, while also providing clear direction and expectations. When performance is sub-par I provide timely feedback and explore the possibilities that all of the subordinate's needs aren't being met. While I wish I could have gone through my career without the trauma of the negative examples, I'm grateful for where I am today.
Reference
Northouse, P. (2018).
Leadership:
Theory and Practice 8th ed. SAGE Publications. Kindle Edition.